1113965 (original text)
|Subject||Re: discussion: who is next?|
|Date||Feb 11, 2011 23:30|
|Released||Mar 14, 2012 22:00|
Iran failed -- we could go back and bring up those reasons why
(overestimation of the protesters by themselves, underestimation of A-Dogg
and his base, and no real foreign access into that base to manipulate
loyalties). There was plenty of access to tweeters, but this didn't speak
to the regime that stood solid and did not fracture.
Now in Egypt, there was extensive consultations between the military and
foreign (the US) throughout the protests. We don't know what was told to
whom, but we do know it was extensive. All this besides whatever the
tweeters were sending in.
I'm not sure if in Tunisia there was as extensive consultations between
the military calling it quits on Ben Ali and any outside pressure or
On 2/11/11 4:14 PM, Sean Noonan wrote:
One major thing about this- Cohen has been working on this for a long
time. Maybe not revolutions per se (I don't know his motives), but in
spreading free speech and political organization through social media.
He was the one who told twitter not to stop service during Iran 2009.
Tunisia and egypt had underlying causes that social media was used as a
tool. (Read the Sweekly, blah blah blah). Maybe they have figured out
now how to target things. But I think they are much more like CANVAS
providing training and better tools, so when the right situation comes
about they are ready to go.
From: Mark Schroeder <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:45:37 -0600 (CST)
To: Analyst List<firstname.lastname@example.org>
ReplyTo: Analyst List <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: discussion: who is next?
it would be pretty great to be able to fast-forward a couple of months
and see who is next, and then walk it back. we all agree on that, we all
agree on wanting to understand patterns.
maybe there's just some small group of twitting free-lancers who are
eager to stir up social protest movements, maybe they have an agenda,
maybe they're just looking for a huge rush even if it risks trouble like
being blindfolded and beaten in some stank cell.
but if they're looking to stir up dissent among old-guard Arab regimes,
and see where that goes as far as shaking them up, they won't be looking
outside the Middle East, and they won't be looking at lower-ranking
states. been there, done that.
On 2/11/11 1:26 PM, Bayless Parsley wrote:
Wait are you saying there is an intntnl conspiracy driving all this in
a coordinated fashion?
On 2011 Feb 11, at 14:14, Mark Schroeder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Just to look at it in another way. On the one hand, there are states
that are facing revolutionary/successionist pressures and that we
can monitor the protests there.
On the other hand, going off of Fred's thoughts of any
Cohen/Google/WH thing going on -- who's higher in the ranking of
significance that we could also look at as next? Tunisia was
small-fry, to test out methods. Egypt was pretty big fry, and that
was pretty successful timing-wise, less than 3 weeks. Going from
Tunisia to Egypt to a chump state (say, Yemen) might not be the
intention or desire. Not to rule those out -- protesters and their
supporters will take what they can get -- and I'm not saying that
protesting will get any easier (or success being likely) when going
up in a ranking of significance, but now there are 2 case studies
under the belt and next could be bigger and more juicy targets even
if they will be difficult.
On 2/11/11 12:16 PM, Peter Zeihan wrote:
First Tunisia, now Egypt.
While obviously protests are key to all this, bear in mind that at
least in the Egyptian case this is more an internal military
succession issue than a revolution, so we need to examine other
states in the same light.
Rather than respond to this thread, please start up new threads
for each individual state that any of you think might be facing
Pls funnel your initial thoughts through Bayless so that we only
have one thread per country.
Remember: this is the question from all of our clients who are
interested in the topic of Egypt.
This website hosts an archive of STRATFOR's emails released by WikiLeaks under "The Global Intelligence Files" project. The emails, dated between July 2004 and late December 2011, reveal confidential email communications between the private intelligence agency, Strategic Forecasting Inc. or STRATFOR, based in Austin, Texas and several large corporations including Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defense Intelligence Agency.
While the emails are generally available at http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/
, we find it hard to search or even navigate the site to read the emails.
We have made all released emails available here at Dazzlepod with the hope to make it easier for readers to browse, search, share and discuss about the released emails. We fetched the emails from the latest torrent made available by WikiLeaks at http://wlstorage.net/torrent/gifiles/
. The latest torrent is usually uploaded by WikiLeaks every 3 hours. To download the latest torrent, you may use this direct link https://dazzlepod.com/gifiles/torrent/
For comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at email@example.com