Cable by Dazzlepod US Embassy Diplomatic Cables from WikiLeaks Released 251287 Cables (Sep 2, 2012)  ·  About
ORIGIN Donate by Bitcoin: 1LtADcWuX3Fn38GVrfAq73Mu1a7gtfzKGP
CONFIDENTIAL (97070)
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN (4678)
SECRET (11322)
SECRET//NOFORN (4330)
UNCLASSIFIED (75792)
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (58095)
Reference ID 09PARTO32028 (original text)
SubjectC) SECRETARY CLINTON'S MARCH 5, 2009, MEETING
OriginUS Delegation, Secretary
ClassificationCONFIDENTIAL
ReleasedAug 30, 2011 01:44
CreatedMar 20, 2009 23:54
VZCZCXRO5998
OO RUEHDBU RUEHPW
DE RUCNAI #0028/01 0792354
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 202354Z MAR 09
FM USDEL SECRETARY//EUROPE MIDEAST//
TO RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE
INFO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI IMMEDIATE
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RUEHNO/USDELMAS BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/CDR USJFCOM NORFOLK VA IMMEDIATE
RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE IMMEDIATE
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI IMMEDIATE C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 09 PARTO 032028 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/06/2019 
TAGS:              
KV, AF, PK 
SUBJECT: (C) SECRETARY CLINTON'S MARCH 5, 2009, MEETING 
WITH THE NORTH ATLANTIC COUNCIL FOREIGN MINISTERS 
 
PARTO 00000028 001.2 OF 009 
 
 
 1. (U) Classified by: Kenneth Merten, Deputy Executive 
Secretary, S/ES, Department of State. Reason 1.4.(d) 
 
 2. (U) March 5, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Brussels, Belgium. 
 
 3. (U) Participants: 
 
U.S. 
The Secretary 
Ambassador Kurt Volker 
EUR A/S Dan Fried 
NSC Senior Director Liz Sherwood-Randall 
Lieutenant General Paul Selva 
 
NATO 
Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer 
Chairman of the Military Committee Admiral 
 
NATO COUNTRIES 
Albania (Invitee): FM Lulzim Basha 
Belgium: FM Karel De Gucht 
Bulgaria: FM Ivailo Kalfin 
Canada: FM Lawrence Cannon 
Croatia (Invitee): FM Gordan Jandrokovic 
Czech Republic: FM Karel Schwarzenberg 
Denmark: FM Dr. Per Stig Moller 
Estonia: FM Urmas Paet 
France: FM Bernard Kouchner 
Germany: FM Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier 
Greece: FM Dora Bakoyannis 
Hungary: FM Dr. Kinga Goncz 
Iceland: Ambassador Thorsteinn Ingolfsson 
Italy: FM Franco Frattini 
Latvia: FM Maris Riekstins 
Lithuania: FM Vygaudas Usackas 
Luxembourg: FM Jean Asselborn 
Netherlands: FM Maxime Verhagen 
Norway: FM Jonas Gahr Store 
Poland: FM Radoslaw Sikorski 
Portugal: FM Luis Amado 
Romania: FM Cristian Diaconescu 
Slovakia: FM Miroslav Lajcak 
Slovenia: FM Samuel Zbogar 
Spain: FM Miguel Angel Moratinos 
Turkey: FM Ali Babacan 
United Kingdom: FM David Miliband 
 
SHAPE 
Supreme Allied Commander Europe: General John Bantz 
Craddock 
Supreme Allied Commander Transformation: General James 
Mattis 
 
EU 
High Representative Javier Solana 
 
 4. (C) SUMMARY: The North Atlantic Council at the level 
of foreign ministers convened March 5, 2009, to discuss 
NATO's operation in Afghanistan and define the Alliance's 
future relationship with Russia. NATO Secretary General 
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer added that the Declaration of 
Alliance Security will be a third key priority at the 
 
PARTO 00000028 002.2 OF 009 
 
 
upcoming Strasbourg/Kehl Summit in April. The Secretary 
stressed the U.S. commitment to "real dialogue" with 
Allies and to giving first priority to collective defense 
while also confronting new threats. France announced 
that it would take a decision on March 17 on seeking 
reintegration into NATO. 
 
 5. (C) Allies appreciated Washington's consultative 
Afghanistan-Pakistan strategic review process, welcomed 
the regional approach, and urged a comprehensive 
"political surge." Discussion centered on how to assure 
security and legitimacy of the Afghan government in the 
May-August time frame after President Karzai's authority 
expires. In a Ministers-only session after the main 
plenary, most Allies expressed strong reservations about 
a "big tent" formula for the pre-Summit Foreign 
Ministers' meeting on Afghanistan, arguing in particular 
the need for proper preparation of such an event. Most 
favored using the "Bucharest formula" with NATO chairing 
and organizing the meeting. 
 
 6. (C) The Secretary, supported by all Allies except 
Lithuania, called for renewed Alliance engagement with 
Russia via the NATO-Russia Council (NRC) while retaining 
a commitment to discuss areas where we disagree with 
Russian actions. Norway challenged Allies to empower the 
Secretary to tell Russian FM Lavrov in Geneva on March 6 
that NATO is ready to re-engage. A number of Allies 
emphasized that the Balkans are in danger of being 
forgotten. They called on the Alliance to remain 
committed to finishing the job in the region and urged 
caution about drawing down KFOR too quickly. END 
SUMMARY. 
 
--------------------------------- 
SUMMIT: CELEBRATION AND CHALLENGE 
--------------------------------- 
 
 7. (C) The Secretary General opened the meeting by 
stating that the Strasbourg-Kehl Summit in April would be 
a celebration. The Alliance looked forward to welcoming 
President Obama and hopefully including Albania and 
Croatia as new members. He emphasized that the Allies 
also needed to use the Summit as an opportunity to show 
determination to confront key challenges, in particular 
in defining NATO's role and strategy in Afghanistan, 
NATO's relations with Russia, and the Declaration on 
Alliance Security. French FM Kouchner added that the 
Summit would be a symbol of Franco-German and European 
reconciliation, an entente for which he credited NATO. 
 
------------------------------------------- 
SECRETARY CALLS FOR REAL DIALOGUE AND UNITY 
------------------------------------------- 
 
 8. (C) Secretary Clinton stressed the U.S. and 
Administration commitment to restoring "real dialogue" 
within the Alliance. The Secretary emphasized the 
importance of not being trapped between false choices of 
"hard" and "soft" power; the Allies need to be "smart," 
committed to using all tools available to ensure 
Transatlantic security. The Secretary called collective 
 
PARTO 00000028 003.2 OF 009 
 
 
defense our "first and overriding priority" and said NATO 
must also be prepared to confront new threats. She 
called on the Alliance to be flexible, pragmatic, and 
united around its shared principles in order to act 
decisively and succeed against old and new threats. 
 
------------------------- 
FRENCH NATO REINTEGRATION 
------------------------- 
 
 9. (C) German Foreign Minister Steinmeier called the 
Secretary's remarks a "fresh impulse" to NATO and 
welcomed the Administration's desire for Allied input. 
French FM Kouchner added that the European Allies wanted 
to respond to the U.S. by being responsible partners. FM 
Kouchner said EU European Security and Defense Policy 
(ESDP) and French reintegration into NATO were 
"supporting strands" and called for better NATO-EU 
cooperation. He expressed conviction that the 
Transatlantic Alliance will be strengthened, and in that 
regard, announced that President Sarkozy will make a 
decision on French reintegration on March 17 "in full 
respect" of NATO's rules. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
AFGHAINSTAN: COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED, APPROACH 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
 10. (C) NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer 
(SYG) called for updating the agreed NATO political- 
military strategy for Afghanistan taking into account the 
evolution of the situation on the ground since last year. 
He highlighted the need for forces, resources, and better 
implementation to make the mission a success. The SYG 
identified five immediate priorities: 1) supporting 
Afghan presidential elections; 2) building up Afghan 
National Security Forces; 3) implementing a whole-of- 
international-community civil-military approach; 4) 
addressing Afghanistan in a regional context; and 5) 
reinforcing NATO cooperation with Pakistan. 
 
 11. (C) Secretary Clinton noted the ongoing U.S. 
strategic review and the upcoming visit of Vice President 
Biden (March 10). She underlined Washington's commitment 
to consultation and listening to input during and beyond 
the review. Ministers responded positively to this tone. 
 
 12. (C) The Secretary pointed out the need for better 
coordination. Denmark and Romania emphasized an 
integrated approach heavy with institutional and 
personnel capacity building, anti-corruption measures, 
and improving rule of law. Norwegian FM Store chided 
Spain for promoting out-of-country training in Madrid of 
Afghan officials rather than engaging them on the ground 
(Spain worried that its soldiers were engaged in 
protecting only themselves without venturing beyond "the 
wire" of their Provincial Reconstruction Team). Store 
said NATO needs a countrywide approach, not a piecemeal 
one, and added that the international community must more 
accurately track development assistance. 
 
 13. (C) UK FM Miliband called the international 
 
PARTO 00000028 004.2 OF 009 
 
 
community's attention to "the critical period of the next 
five years" under a new Afghan government. He cautioned 
against over-focus on the months leading up to elections. 
The Netherlands reminded Ministers that the Afghanistan 
Compact will end in 2010. Miliband emphasized the need 
to practice what we preach on "Afghanization," and said 
NATO should emulate the Iraq model of a province by 
province approach to transferring authority. He noted 
lackluster reconciliation efforts to date. Germany 
underscored the importance of Afghan ownership and 
conditions-based transfer of responsibility. French FM 
Kouchner added that the daily lives of Afghan people 
needed to consistently improve. Bulgaria "urged realism" 
and said the international community might need to 
reconsider its ambitions. 
 
---------------- 
REGIONAL CONTEXT 
---------------- 
 
 14. (C) The Secretary grouped Afghanistan and Pakistan as 
a single strategic concern, and called the border area 
between them the nerve center of global terrorism. 
Germany and France echoed the U.S. designation of an 
Afghanistan-Pakistan Special Representative with similar 
appointments of their own. The Secretary said a long- 
term solution will require a regionally focused, 
integrated civil-military strategy with the participation 
of all Allies, partners, and neighbors. Everyone except 
Belgium welcomed the regional approach - FM De Gucht 
worried about "stigmatizing" Pakistan vis-a-vis India. 
The SYG noted that foreign ministers' decision on NATO's 
future relationship with Russia would have implications 
for Afghanistan on issues of regional stability and 
counter-terrorism. Romania and Latvia proposed broader 
regional engagement with Central Asian states. 
 
--------------------------------- 
SUPPORTING AFGHAN ARMY AND POLICE 
--------------------------------- 
 
 15. (C) The SYG asked nations to support Afghan National 
Security Force development, particularly the enlarged 
Afghan army through contributions to the newly expanded 
Afghan National Army Trust Fund. Secretary Clinton, 
Danish FM Moller, and Norwegian FM Store said NATO should 
step up its efforts in police development and continue 
strengthening the army. In a change from the previous 
Turkish position, FM Babacan called for NATO to do police 
training. Germany and France urged increased NATO 
commitments to police training. Steinmeier encouraged 
additional bilateral police training commitments to the 
Focused District Development program. 
 
 16. (C) Canada, supported by Poland, stressed a common 
approach to security across Afghanistan without caveats 
to give commanders maximum flexibility. Poland tied 
future troop and financial contributions to more 
equitable burden sharing. Canadian FM Cannon asked 
nations to increase contributions of mentoring teams for 
Afghan army and especially police units. Cannon and FM 
Miliband said NATO should give more robust support to 
 
PARTO 00000028 005.2 OF 009 
 
 
Afghan Minister of Interior Atmar and fulfill his 
requests. 
 
 17. (C) Denmark and Turkey welcomed additional U.S. troop 
contributions. Denmark was the only nation to mention 
civilian casualties as a continued critical area of 
focus, but acknowledged recent improvements in ISAF 
procedures and responses when they do occur. 
 
--------------------------------------------- - 
ELECTIONS CREDIBILITY AND BRIDGE OF LEGITIMACY 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
 18. (C) The SYG, supported by Secretary Clinton and 
others, called on nations to support the Afghan 
Independent Election Commission's decision to uphold 
August 20, 2009, as the presidential and provincial 
council election date. He acknowledged the 
constitutional dilemma of Karzai's authority expiring May 
 22. He asked NATO to fulfil elections support force 
requirements. 
 
 19. (C) Allies unanimously agreed that credibility is the 
most critical quality of upcoming elections, which should 
produce a result that reflects the democratic will of the 
people. Turkey asked that all political actors who 
renounce violence be embraced and all ethnicities 
represented in the electoral process. Denmark urged that 
civilian and military contributions to elections 
emphasize burden sharing and Alliance solidarity. Greece 
noted a possible OSCE role in election support. 
 
 20. (C) Afghan FM Spanta phoned the SYG and a number of 
nations to request that NATO support President Karzai's 
continued tenure through the interim May-August period in 
whatever form the government takes. Secretary Clinton 
added that "we have a responsibility to work with the 
Afghan government to help it build a bridge of 
legitimacy" for Karzai during the interim period. Allies 
urged collective diplomatic pressure on Afghanistan to 
find an interim arrangement that is Afghan-owned, agreed 
by Karzai and Parliament, and blessed by the Supreme 
Court. All said the international community will have to 
be careful to support an interim government without 
prejudging election results, while permitting legitimacy 
and security to prevail. 
 
----------------------------- 
NATO ENGAGEMENT WITH PAKISTAN 
----------------------------- 
 
 21. (C) Danish FM Moller said NATO should encourage 
practical military cooperation between Afghanistan and 
Pakistan, and establish the NATO Contact Point Embassy in 
Islamabad. Turkey, Canada, and Greece agreed on the 
importance of improved military consultation with 
Pakistan, but urged NATO to expand the relationship to 
include political dialogue and potential Partnership. 
Italy called for NATO to pay close attention to 
Pakistan's economic and institutional crises, and divert 
Islamabad's focus from a perceived Indian threat to the 
"real threat" in its tribal areas. 
 
PARTO 00000028 006.2 OF 009 
 
 
 
---------------------------------------- 
FORMAT OF PRE-SUMMIT AFGHANISTAN MEETING 
---------------------------------------- 
 
 22. (C) Secretary Clinton proposed holding an Afghanistan 
meeting of Foreign Ministers on March 31, prior to the 
NATO Summit, in a "big tent" formula including NATO 
Allies, ISAF partners, financial contributors, transit 
countries, international organizations, and Afghanistan's 
neighbors. She said UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon may 
convene the meeting, with UN Special Representative of 
the Secretary General Kai Eide chairing. Albania, 
Bulgaria, Croatia, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, The 
Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and 
Spain supported the U.S. proposal for a pre-Summit 
Ministerial, though in a private session many ministers 
questioned the "big tent" format. Canada wanted an only- 
ISAF meeting at the Heads of State and Government level 
at the NATO Summit in April. Italy pointed out the 
importance of including Iran to engage on anti-weapons 
smuggling and counter-narcotics. 
 
 23. (C) Only France and Portugal stressed that a broader- 
format meeting would "universalize" the Afghanistan 
mission as an international community responsibility. 
Other Allies had reservations about extending invitations 
to a broader group at short notice, and said a larger 
meeting must have clear goals, objectives, and outcomes. 
A few ministers were confused whether this meeting would 
be "on Afghanistan including Pakistan as an invitee" or 
"an Af-Pak meeting," preferring the former. 
 
--------------------------------- 
SUMMIT DECLARATION ON AFGHANSITAN 
--------------------------------- 
 
 24. (C) Allies supported a stand-alone NATO Summit 
Declaration on Afghanistan. Denmark, Romania, Italy, 
Slovenia, and Estonia said this statement should reaffirm 
NATO's long-term commitment, show strengthening of the 
integrated civilian-military effort, demonstrate the 
importance of Afghan leadership, highlight international 
community coordination, and showcase a concrete list of 
deliverables. Estonia's FM suggested deliverables, 
including the Afghan National Army Trust Fund expansion, 
a new NATO police training framework, and improved 
cooperation with Pakistan. 
 
-------------------------------------- 
ANNOUNCED CONTRIBUTIONS TO AFGHANISTAN 
-------------------------------------- 
 
 25. (C) Foreign ministers announced the following 
contributions to the effort in Afghanistan during their 
interventions: 
 
-- Lithuania promised additional deployments in Ghor 
province during elections and Special Operations Forces 
for Regional Command South. 
 
-- Germany reiterated its commitment of 500-600 troops 
 
PARTO 00000028 007.2 OF 009 
 
 
for the Elections Support Force (in Regional Command 
North), promised to field a total of seven Operational 
Maneuver and Liaison Teams, and said it is standing up an 
engineering school in Mazar-i Sharif. 
 
-- Romania was adding 135 soldiers to bring their total 
commitment to nearly 1000 troops, and will consider 
additional army and police training. 
 
-- Italy was considering large increases in its police 
training efforts and giving ISAF commanders greater 
flexibility. 
 
-- Albania will add a company to elections support. 
 
-- Croatia will deploy two more mentoring teams (NFI) in 
March, and was considering sending police trainers and 
civilian and development assistance. 
 
------------------ 
RE-ENGAGING RUSSIA 
------------------ 
 
 26. (C) The Secretary called on the Alliance to work with 
Russia on issues of common interest, while also using our 
NATO-Russia engagement to address frankly areas where we 
disagree as well. She encouraged cooperation on 
Afghanistan, counter-narcotics, counter-proliferation, 
counter-terrorism, arms control, and the Iranian and 
North Korean nuclear threats. The Secretary stressed, 
however, that the Allies must never recognize Abkhazia or 
South Ossetia as independent states, nor accept Russian 
assertions of spheres of influence. She called on the 
Allies to stand by our commitment to eventual membership 
of Georgia and Ukraine in NATO. 
 
 27. (C) The Secretary said it was time to reactivate the 
NATO-Russia Council (NRC), not as a reward for Russia but 
as a mechanism for dialogue. All Allies, except 
Lithuania, backed the Secretary's call and expressed 
support for the U.S.-German non-paper on NATO and 
Europe's East as a way forward. Norway challenged Allies 
to empower the Secretary to tell Russian FM Lavrov in 
Geneva on March 6 that NATO is ready to re-engage. 
France, the Netherlands, and Turkey called for a NRC 
Ministerial before June, and Romania said reengagement 
must be part of a broader NATO Eastern policy that 
includes collective defense and enlargement. 
 
 28. (C) Lithuanian FM Usackas expressed general support 
for the U.S.-German proposals, but favored having Heads 
of State and Government take the decision on reactivating 
the NRC at the Summit in April. Germany, Italy, and 
Luxembourg challenged Lithuania to reconsider. Germany 
said it was time to reactivate, but also reform, the NRC 
in order to foster substantive debate with Russia. Czech 
FM Schwarzenberg proposed that Allies also work toward a 
common internal understanding of what they want from the 
NRC. 
 
 29. (C) Canada said that the Allies should deliver a 
strong message to Russia on values and the military 
 
PARTO 00000028 008.2 OF 009 
 
 
build-up in Georgia. British FM Miliband said restarting 
the NRC was not a return to business as usual, and NATO 
should be explicit about putting Georgia on the table in 
the NRC. France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and 
Spain added that the Allies should use dialogue with 
Russia to convey our shared convictions. Belgium, 
Estonia, and Poland agreed but expressed skepticism about 
the likelihood of serious engagement by Russia. Belgium, 
supported by Latvia, said it was even more important to 
have a serious discussion within NATO about energy 
security. 
 
 30. (C) Greek FM Bakoyannis (Note: current OSCE Chairman 
in Office. End Note.) said Allies should look for 
multiple avenues for engaging Russia in dialogue and 
emphasized the OSCE as a forum for discussing Russian 
President Medvedev's European Security Treaty proposal. 
Bulgaria, Estonia, and Hungary said the OSCE is the 
primary forum for this discussion, but cautioned against 
jeopardizing the current security architecture. Hungary 
said NATO should also discuss the Medvedev proposal 
internally, and Turkey said NATO should use the NRC to 
influence Russia on this issue. In the end, after a 
lengthy ministers-only session and substantial 
negotiation in the corridors, Lithuania joined consensus 
on a text that the SYG used with the press, resuming the 
NATO-Russia Council, including at ministerial level, 
while stressing we will also raise areas of disagreement 
with Russia, including concerning Georgia. 
 
------------------------------------ 
WESTERN BALKANS: UNFINISHED BUSINESS 
------------------------------------ 
 
 31. (C) The Secretary, backed by the Czech Republic, 
Hungary, Norway, Slovakia, and Croatia, emphasized that 
the Balkans are in danger of being forgotten and called 
on the Alliance to remain committed to finishing the job 
in the region. Czech FM Schwarzenberg, supported by 
Albania and Slovenia, said NATO should send a strong 
message of support to the Western Balkans at the Summit. 
Hungary said NATO's commitment to the Western Balkans 
should be included in the Declaration on Alliance 
Security. 
 
 32. (C) Hungary warned that NATO's credibility was at 
stake if it failed to admit Albania and Croatia as 
members at the Summit, and Slovenian FM Zbogar said his 
government was working hard to ensure ratification before 
the Summit. Slovakian FM Lajcak said NATO needed a 
unified approach to Bosnia. Hungary and Slovenia said 
NATO should offer a Membership Action Plan (MAP) to 
Montenegro at the Summit, and Hungary added that the 
Alliance should send a positive message to Serbia. 
 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
KOSOVO: DISCUSSION OF KFOR DOWNSIZING UNHELPFUL 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
 
 33. (C) The SYG, supported by Secretary Clinton, 
reiterated that public speculation on downsizing KFOR is 
 
PARTO 00000028 009.2 OF 009 
 
 
unhelpful. The Council will take a political decision on 
this issue only after receiving military advice from 
SACEUR, and the situation in Kosovo remains too fragile 
for disengagement. The Czech Republic, France, Greece, 
Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey, and Albania 
reiterated that now is not the right time to downsize 
KFOR, although French FM Kouchner added that KFOR should 
move to a deterrent presence as soon as conditions 
permitted. 
 
 34. (C) Germany and Denmark expressed optimism about the 
situation in Kosovo, and Danish FM Moller called on the 
Alliance to give thorough consideration to whether the 
time was right for moving KFOR to deterrent presence. 
The UK acknowledged the SYG's point, but pleaded for a 
"private" plan to reconfigure KFOR. Spain said it does 
not plan to withdraw its forces from KFOR, but would not 
block consensus on moving to deterrent presence. 
 
 35. (C) Turkish FM Babacan said it planned to increase 
its contribution to the EU Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo 
(EULEX), called on EULEX to reach full operating 
capability quickly, and said that KFOR should not serve 
as a "static protection force" for EULEX. Hungary and 
Slovenia said KFOR-EULEX cooperation was critical. The 
Netherlands pledged to contribute 1 million euros to the 
Kosovo Security Force (KSF) stand-up fund. 
 
---------------------------- 
RAISING ARMS CONTROL PROFILE 
---------------------------- 
 
 36. (C) Germany, supported by the Netherlands and Norway, 
called on the Alliance to give priority to arms control 
and disarmament, saying the topic was important for 
convincing younger Europeans of NATO's relevance. German 
FM Steinmeier said reductions were feasible and should be 
envisioned. He said more needs to be done on CFE and, 
backed by Greece, called arms control an area where 
renewed dialogue with Russia is key. 
 
--------------------------------------------- - 
NATO HQ REFORM: SYG ASKS FOR ALLIANCE SUPPORT 
--------------------------------------------- - 
 
 37. (C) The U.S., Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, 
Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, and the UK 
supported SYG's NATO headquarters reform proposals, and 
SYG called for HQ reform to be a deliverable for the 
Summit. Greece, Romania, Spain, and Turkey stressed the 
need to preserve consensus decision-making and protect 
the role of the Military Committee. 
 
--------------- 
MISSILE DEFENSE 
--------------- 
 
 38. (C) Czech FM Schwarzenberg said NATO should continue 
to work on missile defense, calling it a key tool to 
protect Allies "if diplomacy fails." 
CLINTON
This website hosts an archive of all 251,287 US Embassy diplomatic cables that were released by WikiLeaks between November 28, 2010 and September 2, 2011.

While the cables are generally available at http://wikileaks.org/cablegate.html, we find it hard to search or even navigate the site to read the cables.

We have made all 251,287 cables available here at Dazzlepod with the hope to make it easier for readers to browse, search, share and discuss about the released cables.

The cables are periodically selected and posted to our Twitter page and Facebook page for readers to review them.

For comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at wikileaks@dazzlepod.com.

- Dazzlepod